Razgovor:Progon Nijemaca nakon Drugog svjetskog rata
| Ovo je stranica za razgovor za raspravu o poboljšanjima na članku Progon Nijemaca nakon Drugog svjetskog rata. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| Pismohrane: | |||
Analize događaja[uredi kôd]
Not Analize but rather presentation of pro-German opinions.Xx236 (razgovor) 14:16, 15. siječnja 2016. (CET)
do najviše 3 milijuna žrtava,[17][uredi kôd]
[17] Ingo Haar - I don't have access to his text but he opposes such stories.Xx236 (razgovor) 14:27, 15. siječnja 2016. (CET)
More data needed. Kubura (razgovor) 17:12, 17. siječnja 2016. (CET)
- It's reference 18 after my edit.
- It's the task od the editor to support his text, especially when it's closed to the majority of readers, see page 271 [1].
- Ingo Haar has never claimed that the number of victims was 3 000 000, he opposed such opinions. [2] [3]
- The English article is much better than this one and it quotes plenty of sources. Xx236 (razgovor) 14:26, 18. siječnja 2016. (CET)
Inline sources? Quotations? It's not just "here's the book, go and search"; sometimes the keywords do not catch the proper page, and situation is even worse when the pdf is a scanned picture, so no search is possible.
If You challenge the text, then You need to provide the data.
We do not divinize English articles, especially in social sciences, since we encountered there a lot of biased attitudes, censorship, etc. Kubura (razgovor) 01:55, 24. siječnja 2016. (CET)
- German sources to German history may be also biased.Xx236 (razgovor) 15:17, 6. lipnja 2016. (CEST)
Karta rasprostranjenosti njemačkog jezika po Europi prije (lijevo) i poslije Drugog svjetskog rata (desno)[uredi kôd]
Lies, lies, lies.
- The left map is based on 1910 census, also prije Prvogo svjetskog rata.
- The right map - 1950.Xx236 (razgovor) 15:22, 6. lipnja 2016. (CEST)
- Interesting - the map doesn't show Jugoslavia. The others (Poles) are guilty.Xx236 (razgovor) 15:25, 6. lipnja 2016. (CEST)